| Thursday 9th of September 2010 23:33 CET | ||||
|
:: IMP Member Login
:: Legal & Contact
All content Copyright © 2000-2010 tWorks unless otherwise noted.
This website uses cookies Webmaster contact: admin@impgroup.org |
Contents of IMP Journal issue 1, volume 2
‘Exit, voice and loyalty’ in business to business marketsAuthorsKeith Blois AbstractHirschman (1970) uses an analytical discussion to consider how a customer may use ‘voice’ or display ‘loyalty’ within an exchange situation rather than discontinue the exchange by ‘exiting’. While his analysis provides valuable insights into customers’ behaviour towards their suppliers, the need for further development of his analysis when applied to business to business exchanges is considered. In particular the paper will argue that there are circumstances where, rather than to respond to the customer’s ‘voice’, the supplier will prefer the customer to ‘exit’. Finally the potential use of ‘event analysis’ to provide insights into the financial impacts of ‘exit, voice or loyalty’ is considered. Keywords: Exchanges, Financial implications, Loyalty, Relationships When Resource Interfaces Are Neglected: Lessons From HistoryAuthorsAlexandra Waluszewski and Martin Johanson AbstractThis paper examines the issues of business resources and resource interfaces by presenting a longitudinal case study of a company coping with the transition from a centralised Soviet economy to a more conventional situation. The paper draws distinctions between different interaction patterns: those dominated by indirect interaction inspired by hierarchical thinking; very 'thin' interaction inspired by traditional market theory, or 'thick' interaction inspired by insights on what can be reached through resource combining effects. The case study shows how the kind of interaction pattern that a company is embedded in will determine its way of functioning. The case company’s struggle with its resource interfaces also highlights what constitutes 'normality' in business landscapes characterised by a 'thick' interaction pattern, or a decentralised way of handling resources interfaces. The case also highlights what is required for processes where both efficiency and effectiveness can be created through dealing directly with resource interfaces. Finally, the experiences of the case company can also be seen as arguments for considering what effects more minor variations in an economic landscape have for the possibility of creating effectiveness and efficiency through direct interaction around resource interfaces. If the overall economic landscape is dominated by some few owners (whether families, multinationals or governments) with short-term profit focuses and/or by a 'top-down' management style, there are reasons to believe that this will have negative effects on the way resource interfaces are dealt with and consequently on effectiveness and efficiency issues. Contrariwise, if an economic landscape has a more interactive nature, i.e., if it is dominated by a heterogeneous ownership structure, by decentralised management style and technologically skilled and engaged people, this will probably have positive effects on effectiveness and efficiency issues. Key Words: Business relationships, History, Interaction, Resources, Resource interfaces, Soviet Union, Transition. Business relationships and resource combiningAuthorsLars-Erik Gadde and Håkan Håkansson AbstractThe increasing significance of relationships is acknowledged by various schools of thought. Despite the fact that these approaches describe and explain business relationships somewhat differently, they seem to share the view that there is a strong association between a company’s business relationships and its use and control of resources. The aim of this paper is to explore the role of business relationships in systematic combining of resources. We begin with an illustration of resource combining across firms’ boundaries in the steel industry. On the basis of this example we make a distinction between resource combining within relationships and between relationships and explore the characteristics of the two. This section is followed by a framework for analysis of resource combining building on four categories of resources. The framework is then used to exemplify systematic resource combining in three different dimensions: primary, secondary and tertiary. Finally, we conclude by interpreting the role of business relationships in systematic resource combining. From the organizational theory perspective it is claimed that the processes of building interorganizational relationships can be regarded as a flow of resources between organizations (van de Ven 1976). In transaction cost analysis ‘asset specificity’ is a central concept denoting resources dedicated to specific business partners. According to Dyer and Singh (1998) a firm may consciously seek advantages by designing resources that are specialized in conjunction with those of a customer or supplier. Once a high degree of asset specificity is established business exchange is best supported by organizational forms enhancing cooperation and proximity between the partners (Dyer 1997). Key words: resources, resource combining, categories of resources, business relationships Pictures At An Exhibition Of Business Markets: Is There A Case For Competition?AuthorsMalcolm T Cunningham AbstractThis paper has uses the phrase ‘pictures at an exhibition’ as a metaphor for the research studies presented at the annual conference on business markets by the IMP group. The early IMP ‘pictures’ of business-to-business relationships, dyadic interactions and markets as networks have had a major influence over the past 30 years on European research. However, the increasingly dominant research focus upon cooperative relationships has been at the expense of research into various facets of competition and the competitive behaviour firms. This paper suggests that many ‘art critics’ have expressed concerns that the research pictures at the IMP exhibition have become somewhat stereotyped and would benefit from inputs of ideas and concepts emerging in relevant fields of literature. This paper concentrates on several neglected pictures of competition in business markets. It presents a sketch of the dynamic competitive environment and displays various studies of competitive strategies to demonstrate how firms actually compete. It is argued that ‘relationships’, interactions and network positioning should be seem as essential steps in developing competitive strategies at the level of the individual firm. An in-depth picture of the activities of a “tribal group” in the German packaging industry is presented as a case study. The analysis of the case study draws upon several concepts of competition and competitive behaviour arising in the earlier sections of this paper. Suppliers within the tribal group were shown to act in a complex mixture of cooperative, transactional, competitive and collusive modes of behaviour. Keywords: Competitive Strategies, IMP Group, Stereotyping |
|||